Posted by
Amy Lyn on Sunday, December 09, 2007 11:38:21
Who's Zoomin' Who?
Aretha Franklin first asked that sultry, mocking question back in the 1980's but it seems to fit today's Presidential race. In her song about a personal relationship, the "prey" is actually the predator: the player is played. "Take another look and tell me baby. Who's zoomin' who?" Now, that's a question one should bring to the current political process where there is much manipulation and a kind of social looting going on in the name of helping "victims".
Victims of what? The Democrats tell us the country needs to be saved from a lot of evil players: heartless Republicans, predatory capitalism, social inequities of a trillion kinds. For example, when asked if she was a liberal in the mold of JFK, Senator Clinton replied that she considered herself a progressive in the mold of FDR. And she's not kidding. FDR brought us, in his famous 4 Fears speech of 1941, the idea of big government saving us from all "fear and want". Hillary has apparently looked across this great nation of over 300 million souls and found no little "fear and want". That is how she can justify a 110 billion dollar annual expenditure. (Some economist estimate the Clinton Healthcare Plan could soak the the US Economy for up to 1/7th the GDP) Ofcourse, this all begs the question....When the elimination of "fear and want" becomes the goal of government, is 110 billion dollars anywhere near enough? I like how Rudy Gulliani answered that question after Senator Clinton said "I have a million ideas but America can't afford them all." He said to her "America can't afford you". But, what really separates Hillary and the Democrats from FDR is their methods.
Roosevelt lived at a time when nearly everyone recognized absolute truths in a Judeo-Christian framework while today's Democrats are mostly hard-core relativists in, what Senator Clinton calls, a postmodern world.
The irony is that relativism turns the lights out, so to speak, on free public debate. More and more, the Left is manipulating the huge advantage they have in playing with truth concepts. While Republicans are still trying to play by the old rules of principled stands based on absolute truth concepts from the Judeo-Christian ethic. For example, John Edwards played the relativist game the other day by claiming 35 million Americans were going hungry. He said "this election is about those people". This has become a trend in Leftist methods. It seems they take a study, in this case a USDA study that mentions that 35 million Americans need to "reduce variety in their diets" at various times throughout the year, and they make an outlandish claim. Edwards may also know that some honest person has to look coldhearted in exploding the lie. It becomes a win-win manipulation of the ignorant populace in the name of "standing up for the little guy". This has become a pattern of the Left and the Mainstream media is enabling it in spades.
At a time in our nation's history when reasoned, public debate is more necessary than ever, the standard debate forum is being dumb down and truncated. We need serious questions and long answers...but were getting You Tube and "boxers or briefs" questions with breathless answer periods. The MSM is biased toward the Left and now this is a further advantage they can bestow. When they are not asking the Republicans biased questions like "when did you stop beating your wife?" .....we are getting more and more trivial forums and less response time. This advantages those on the Left whose emotional "picture arguments" collapse under slightly prolonged intellectual scrutiny. This leaves the Republicans only 3 paths. They can continue to play on an uneven playing field...and hope to find another great communicator like Ronald Reagan (who was pretty adept at "picture arguments" himself)...or they can lie too. However, they cannot continue to follow the failed policy of George W. Bush and simply ignore the lies and vitriol of the Left.
People are wired for Truth but the Right seems to no longer be able to count on the average person seeing through the darkness of social relativism. It is like a "blackout" the Left promotes then manipulates. The public hears statements like this from Hillary....... "We can talk all we want about freedom and opportunity, about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but what does that mean to a mother or father who can't take a sick child to the doctor?" The public is being played the fool. Someone needs to point out that such questions are designed to be "picture arguments" used to manipulate in the midst of a social blackout she fully enjoys. The Left is doing a lot of looting in the name of "helping the little guy"....and someone needs to ask the American public. "Take another look baby. Who's zoomin' who?"